sections |
Submitted on behalf of James W. Nolan Jr. ’77, Parent ’01, chair of the Presidential Search Committee As we come to the end of the academic year, I’d like to share an update on the recent activities and next steps for the Presidential Search Committee. For quick reference, here is a summary of the committee’s overarching timeline, which I describe in more detail below.
What We’ve Done So Far I want to thank all those who took the time to share their opinions, aspirations, and concerns so far, and I want to assure you that the committee and I are carefully examining all of your input. That input is critical for helping us develop a prospectus that most accurately and compellingly captures the college, and for helping us evaluate potential candidates. If you haven’t had a chance yet to share your thoughts, it isn’t too late: You can send your input to ithacapresident@spencerstuart.com. What We’re Currently Working On This month, we have been focusing on a few key activities: Developing the prospectus Defining our process’s guiding principles and protocols
As we’ve started our work, we’ve learned from our consultants and other search experts that, in recent years, potential presidential candidates have become increasingly reluctant to subject themselves to a search process that includes highly public campus visibility, such as those that have been common at IC for faculty, deans, and other administrative positions. We can understand this new reality, given the influence of social media and the rapid nature in which information now travels. The best candidates will already be employed by other institutions, and we want to ensure that they are willing to participate in our process in a manner that respects their need for confidentiality. At the same time, we also recognize and deeply value the role of transparency and engagement in our community, particularly at this time. We want to ensure that the community is able to remain connected to this process, while also attracting the broadest possible range of talented candidates. We have not finalized all the interaction points a candidate will have with the community, and we are currently evaluating how other institutions have achieved this important balance. If you'd like to share your ideas about how we might structure a process that maintains candidate confidentiality, provides exposure to the IC community, and serves as the best fit for Ithaca College’s needs, please send an email to ithacapresident@spencerstuart.com. What Happens Next We expect the prospectus to be approved by the search committee and the Board of Trustees by the end of May. The final prospectus will be posted to the search website and will be provided to all those interested in being considered for the position. Over the summer: You will hear from me at least once a month over the summer, with updates on the committee’s progress and the factors that we are deliberating together. What You Can Do
Now that we’ve gotten under way, I am feeling even more optimistic about our process, the level of engagement and feedback from the community, and the incredible dedication and wisdom of our search committee. We appreciate all of the support we have received so far, and we are looking forward to the months ahead. Sincerely, May 11, 2016, Update on Presidential Search Comment from
rosentha on
05/12/16
May 11, 2016, Update on Presidential Search Comment from
dturkon on
05/12/16
I am dismayed that you are even considering a confidential search for president of IC. You state that "...we’ve learned from our consultants and other search experts that, in recent years, potential presidential candidates have become increasingly reluctant to subject themselves to a search process that includes highly public campus visibility..." Yet, the AAUP condemns confidential searches as an affront on transparency and shared governance. They note your main argument to justify this consideration and also say there is no evidence to back the claim. "The rationale for such secrecy is that open meetings discourage applications from highly qualified candidates, although no evidence has ever been offered to suggest that this is in fact the case." ( http://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/AAUP_Statement_on_Presidential_Searches_0.pdf ). Lack of transparency and reluctance to share governance are two of the qualities the current president has displayed, and ones we do not want to see in a future president. Anyone who respects those values will have no problem participating in an open search. Anyone who does not want to participate in an open search should be considered suspect with regard to their values in this area. Very best, David Turkon Associate professor and chair of anthropology |
© Copyright Ithaca College. All rights reserved; unauthorized use prohibited. All material on this server is produced by our community but, except for designated pages, is neither approved nor verified by Ithaca College.
Stuart copies and pastes for each institution. It masquerades as
"transparency" but essentially this is lip service, telling us ABSOLUTELY
nothing.
I expect that there is a lot more going on behind the scenes than is being
let on.
When the consultants visited, they referred to the higher ed part of their
practice as "boutique." So the board, amidst rampant corporatizing efforts
overall by IC, picked a massive corporation that barely focuses on higher
ed to "hand pick a global leader." If we don't get more involved in the
process, we're just going to end up with Rochon 2.0, maybe someone who
pays lip service to diversity, but not someone with IC's future at their heart.